**Geometrizing Gravity**

**Einstein's Idea:**

**pick up on Minkowski's spacetime model, encoding the idea that the spacetime interval between events is fundamental and elevating it to an assumption about the very nature of the geometry of four dimensional spacetime**

**incorporate the principle of equivalence by encoding the gravitational redshift/blueshift as some appropriate structures imposed on the set of spatio-temporal events**

**remove the restriction of prior spacetime models which prevented the geometric structures from incluence by material content...i.e. removed assumption of absolute structure.**

**A Path to the Geometrization of Gravity--'Suggested' by Experiments**

**...This is a 'new' organization of ideas...somewhat different from what
is in the book...**

**We take the point of view that whatever theoretical foundation we put down
for gravitation and other phenomena, we base it as closely as possible to
experimental results.**

**We take the following experimental underpinnings as given [i.e. well tested
and verified]:**

**All prior experiments testing the postulates of the special theory, which we now interpret as providing local information about spacetime structure.**

**The organization of ideas of Minkowski as an integrative scheme for accounting for the results of the tests of the postulates of the special theory.****Thus the local spacetime structure is given by the interval between events in a local region:****ds**^{2}**= - c**^{2}**dt**^{2}**+ dx**^{2}**+ dy**^{2}**+ dz**^{2}^{Note that Minkowski spacetime possesses the causal structure imposed by the lightcone.}**The Pound-Rebka/Pound-Snider experiments imply that clocks run at different rates depending on their position in relation to sources of gravitation [heavy masses...]. This is taken to imply that the Minkowski spacetime interval needs revision for non-local experiments:****Using g = G M/ R**^{2}_{e }**we could show that the form is****ds**^{2}**= - c**^{2}**( 1 -2GM/(c**^{2}**r))dt**^{2 }**+ dx**^{2}**+ dy**^{2}**+ dz**^{2 }**where the combination r**_{s}**= 2GM/c**^{2 }**is called the Schwarzschild radius and will play an important role later. Note that as we get far from the object whose mass is M we approach the Minkowksi spacetime model.****Radar-Ranging Experiments: This is a set of experiments performed by I. Shapiro and collaborators beginning in the mid 1960's in which they sent a radar pulse from the earth to Mercury, having it graze the outer limb of the Sun. The figure below shows the idea:**

**The Radar-ranging experiment measured the time it takes for the radar to
go from the earth to Mercury and back.**

**Using the time-only warped spacetime, one can calculate the time it would take for the radar to go from the earth and return...the result is in disagreement with the experimental findings of Shapiro.****One concludes that the time-only warped spacetime can not be valid in general****Thus, there is a need to change something more about the geometry....**

**Among the various possibilities of things to change, we take the Einstein
point of view that it is the geometric structure which is to encode the
information related to gravitation. This point of view suggests that we
consider warping space in addition to time. **

**This means that we consider the following form for the interval between
events:**

**ds**^{2}** = - c**^{2}** ( 1 -2GM/(c**^{2}** r))dt**^{2 }**+ g**_{xx}**dx**^{2}** + g**_{yy}**dy**^{2}** + g**_{zz}**dz**^{2 }

**where the g**_{xx}**, g**_{yy}**, and g**_{zz}** are functions to be determined so that the resulting spacetime structure
is consistent both with the Pound-Rebka experiment and the Shapiro radar-ranging
experiments.**

**The important point to make is: The 1915 geometric theory of gravitation of A. Einstein does this without
any freely adjustable parameters!**

**Geodesics of Spacetime**

**Connection on Spacetime**

**Curvature**

**Matter-Geometry Coupling**

**Einstein's Theory and its Implications**

**Geodesics of Spacetime**

**In Euclidean space, the shortest distance between two points is a 'straight'
line...**

**However, on the surface of a sphere the shortest distance between two points
on the sphere is not the Euclidean distance between those points....one
must stay on the surface.**

**On the surface of the sphere, there are paths which connect pairs of points
in the shortest way : the great circles do this:**

**The equator-circling curve is closed, of finite length, and the is an ideal
curve in the sense that it is the shortest one which goes around the equator
and returns to its original point.**

**The geodesic curves on a two-dimensional surface are defined to be those
which have the shortest possible lenght as measured by observers who live
and move in the surface without knowledge of any higher-dimensional space
outside. **

**For the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein chose to identify these shortest
possible curves in SOME four-dimentional spacetime with the paths along
which test particles move. **

**Connections**

**It was not realized until almost 1918 that another important element which
is needed is this concept of connection....by Hermann Weyl and Tuillio Levi-Civita...**

**The basic idea: **

**In order to compare quantities at different spatial points one needs to
have a method whereby the objects which live at those points can be copied
and brought to the same point for the comparison.**

**Consider the problem of comparing two vectors at different points A and
B. In Euclidean space we do this as follows.**

**At point A we make a copy of the vector**

**We then transport it, keeping it parallel to itself from A to B along a straight line connecting the two points**

**When the vector originally defined at A has been transported to B maintaining its auto-parallel orientation, we then have two vectors at the same point and we can then easily see whether they are the same length and whether they point in the same direction.****However, in non-Euclidean spaces such as the surface of the sphere, this procedure is not well-defined without some modifications...****The point: Whether in Euclidean space or some more general space, one needs a RULE to be in effect to allow the comparison of objects at different points...****The rule which tells one how to compare objects at different points is called a***CONNECTION*.**Elie Cartan and the Geometrization of Newtonian Gravity****In the period 1921-1925 the famous mathematician Elie Cartan showed how Newtonian gravitation could be 'geometrized' by making use of this idea of connection.****He used the connection to 'hide' the gravitational effects**

**Needed digression: Newton's Second Law of Motion tells one that the acceleration that an object feels in a gravitational field is due to the earth acting at a distance according to the inverse square law. This law is written as follows:****Cartan invented a new operation: D/Dt which included the force term as part of the definition with the result that the object freely falling in a gravitational field does so uniformly with respect to this new D/Dt rule. It is this new derivative rule which incorporates gravity in the rule itself. No longer is it the case that gravity is a separate force, but rather it is included automatically in the definition of how we move from point to point in the simplest manner....****This rule for connecting points in a world with gravitation included in the very geometric fabric shows that the Einstein goal can be achieved even for Newtionian gravitation !!****The motion of an object which adapts as best it can to the background geometry will move along the simplest path: a geodesic path.****Hence: Cartan achieved a version of the Einstein program but did not have to resort to changing the Euclidean nature of space or time..... However, the resulting geometrized version of Newtonian gravity is incompatible with the Special Theory of Relativity.**We shall presently see that Einstein went the whole way in that he geometrized ALL OF space , time, and the connection to non-Euclidean versions. Only then did he achieve the synthesis.